Two Minute Talk
Today, I gave this speech to one of my favorite communities: engineering educators and engineering education researchers. I had two minutes to give an overview of my 2011 paper that won a best paper award. It read like one of my blog entries so I figured it should go here.
Thank you. I am really happy to be here, with my engineering education community. In particular, with my co-author Andrew who brought an international perspective to the paper.
Connection to community is important to us all. And possibly even more so to our students, who don’t yet know if they belong to our community of engineers. This paper is about a social instruction strategy called team testing. The idea behind social instruction strategies is that we can use social experiences of learning to improve student engagement with the technical content we are teaching.
By creating situations where students are prepared to engage with the content (they studied for the exam, right?), we can ask them to talk, intelligently, about problems or content they have already struggled with, and perhaps mastered.
We tried two approaches: repeating an individual exam for bonus points or partitioning the exam into individual and group components.
What makes this strategy social? One rule we used was that all students had to agree on the submitted solution. No divide and conquer. Another was that everyone had to speak and everyone had to write part of the solution. Students teach each other, learn from each other, and negotiate their ways to answers that are, on average, more correct than they are on individual exams.
As professors, we relish the easy engagement and on-task conversation of our students. And we all appreciated the faster feedback mechanism for student learning. Lower-division students begin to feel a sense of camaraderie and belonging. Upper-division students feel the safety net of working on difficult problems together.
Team testing is an easy way to implement a social instruction strategy and help build a community of learners within your classroom.
Why don’t you try it next year?
Thank you. I am really happy to be here, with my engineering education community. In particular, with my co-author Andrew who brought an international perspective to the paper.
Connection to community is important to us all. And possibly even more so to our students, who don’t yet know if they belong to our community of engineers. This paper is about a social instruction strategy called team testing. The idea behind social instruction strategies is that we can use social experiences of learning to improve student engagement with the technical content we are teaching.
By creating situations where students are prepared to engage with the content (they studied for the exam, right?), we can ask them to talk, intelligently, about problems or content they have already struggled with, and perhaps mastered.
We tried two approaches: repeating an individual exam for bonus points or partitioning the exam into individual and group components.
What makes this strategy social? One rule we used was that all students had to agree on the submitted solution. No divide and conquer. Another was that everyone had to speak and everyone had to write part of the solution. Students teach each other, learn from each other, and negotiate their ways to answers that are, on average, more correct than they are on individual exams.
As professors, we relish the easy engagement and on-task conversation of our students. And we all appreciated the faster feedback mechanism for student learning. Lower-division students begin to feel a sense of camaraderie and belonging. Upper-division students feel the safety net of working on difficult problems together.
Team testing is an easy way to implement a social instruction strategy and help build a community of learners within your classroom.
Why don’t you try it next year?